300
I saw 300 on Wednesday, and I was ... disappointed. I think I knew too much and expected too much going into the movie. Last year I read Gates of Fire by Stephen Pressfield and had a pretty good idea of the battle. I also had read (several years ago) Plutarch's biography of Lycurgus, the greatest king of Sparta, and I've also had a class in the history of law, in which we covered early Greek law and political processes (albeit most of it from the Athenian perspective). And, of course, I had read 300 by Frank Miller (and loved it).
The problem being is that the movie tried too hard. It didn't want to be 300, it wanted to be Lord of the Rings. Although it was based on 300 it was influenced more by LOTR than anything else. It dehumanized the Persians - literally turning them into monsters, which I think did a disservice to both sides. The Immortals were called the Immortals because their ranks always numbered 10,000. Losses were replaced overnight. They also left out my favorite part of the story: the part where the Spartans struck back and made a raid on Xerxes' tent, nearly killing him.
I also didn't like the scenes with Leonidas' wife. I thought that they slowed the movie down and interrupted the action. I don't remember any of that political playing in the graphic novel, but I could be wrong. What I wish they had shown was when Leonidas (I think) tells someone how Spartan women are stronger than Spartan men - because they can willingly let husbands and sons go to die.
However, if I hadn't known as much about the history of Thermopylae, then I think I would have found this movie incredible. As it was, I saw more flaws than I wanted to. The music, however, was AWESOME. It rivals the Conan theme for sheer power (and may even be better).
It was good, but not great. On the other hand, I'd been up more than 24 hours at that point and it just might be my lack of sleep that made the movie so disappointing. Oh well. If anyone wants to get a really good idea of the battle, I seriously recommend Gates of Fire - it fills in all the empty spots and makes the tale so much more powerful and tragic than 300 (the movie) ever could.
Review OVER!
The problem being is that the movie tried too hard. It didn't want to be 300, it wanted to be Lord of the Rings. Although it was based on 300 it was influenced more by LOTR than anything else. It dehumanized the Persians - literally turning them into monsters, which I think did a disservice to both sides. The Immortals were called the Immortals because their ranks always numbered 10,000. Losses were replaced overnight. They also left out my favorite part of the story: the part where the Spartans struck back and made a raid on Xerxes' tent, nearly killing him.
I also didn't like the scenes with Leonidas' wife. I thought that they slowed the movie down and interrupted the action. I don't remember any of that political playing in the graphic novel, but I could be wrong. What I wish they had shown was when Leonidas (I think) tells someone how Spartan women are stronger than Spartan men - because they can willingly let husbands and sons go to die.
However, if I hadn't known as much about the history of Thermopylae, then I think I would have found this movie incredible. As it was, I saw more flaws than I wanted to. The music, however, was AWESOME. It rivals the Conan theme for sheer power (and may even be better).
It was good, but not great. On the other hand, I'd been up more than 24 hours at that point and it just might be my lack of sleep that made the movie so disappointing. Oh well. If anyone wants to get a really good idea of the battle, I seriously recommend Gates of Fire - it fills in all the empty spots and makes the tale so much more powerful and tragic than 300 (the movie) ever could.
Review OVER!
